Finding the Truth - Birth
Certificate - Climate Gate
Richard Salbato 12-19-09
When I started to write this
Newsletter I wanted to teach people how to seek the truth, want the truth and
love the truth. Many people do not know how
to find and see the truth, some do not want to know the truth, and some even
hate the truth that they know. Christ
told Pilate that He came into the world to “bear witness to the truth”, but
Pilate mocked Him because Pilate did not care about truth, only power and
expediency.
The fact is that truth does
matter and some truths are very important.
The first truth that must be loved is admitting when we do not know
something. The second most important truth
is about ourselves and truly knowing ourselves. The third is finding out why we are here, how
we choose to live, and where are we going when we die.
I decided to use two very
controversial issues to teach people how to find the truth and why the truth is
important. These two issues have very
strong supporters on both sides of the issue and the ramifications of knowing
the truth are so important they can change the world, if the truth is not
exposed.
1. Obama’s Birth Certificate
2. The truth about Climate
Change
Why are these to things so
important? If our commander in chief is
not a legal president, how did he even get away with running for president,
where is his loyalty, who is hiding the truth for him, what is his real
background? What is he hiding and how is
he doing it.
If climate change is a 40 year
deliberate lie with no science to prove it, what do they really want and what
effect will it have on the entire free world?
The ramifications of these two
things are so important that if we do not know the truth, it could change the
entire world as we know it.
The Birth Certificate
When I first heard about the
controversy over the birth certificate, like most people, I said so what. Even if he is not an American born citizen,
the ramifications of declaring him illegal would cause huge riots in the
streets and the Democratic Congress would not do anything about it anyway.
My second thought was that no
one could run for President without the FBI doing a background check on him and
he could not hide the fact. Not only
that but he has produced a “Certificate
of Birth”
Then thinking, which is what you have to do to know the truth, I
wondered what the difference is between a Birth Certificate and a Certificate
of Birth.
I looked it up and was
surprised at what I found.
“[§338-17.8] Certificates for children born out of State.
(a) Upon application of an adult or the legal parents of a minor child,
the director of health shall issue a birth certificate for such adult or minor,
provided that proof has been submitted to the director of health that the legal
parents of such individual while living without the Territory or State of
Hawaii had declared the Territory or State of Hawaii as their legal residence
for at least one year immediately preceding the birth or adoption of such
child.
(b) Proof of legal residency shall be submitted to the director of health
in any manner that the director shall deem appropriate. The director of
health may also adopt any rules pursuant to chapter 91 that he or she may deem
necessary or proper to prevent fraudulent applications for birth certificates
and to require any further information or proof of events necessary for
completion of a birth certificate.
(c) The fee for each application for registration shall be established by
rule adopted pursuant to chapter 91. [L 1982, c 182, §1]”
Everybody get that?
As long as an adult can walk into
The child, on the other hand, could have been born in
This is the only
document BO has ever produced. What does
it say? It says only what BO wanted it
to say. It does not prove anything. It does not say who the doctor was, what hospital he was born in and it is not a Birth
Certificate.
Here’s
what Hawaii
A. From Hawaii’s official
Department of Health, Vital Records webpage:
“Amended certificates of birth may be prepared and filed with the Department of
Health, as provided by law, for 1) a person born in
B. A parent may register an in-state birth in lieu of certification by a
hospital of birth under HRS
338-5.
C. Hawaiian law expressly provides for registration of out-of-state births
under HRS
338-17.8. A foreign birth
presumably would have been recorded by the American consular of the country of
birth, and presumably that would be reflected on the Hawaiian birth
certificate.
D. Hawaiian law, however, expressly acknowledges that its system is subject
to error. See, for example, HRS
338-17.
E. Hawaiian law expressly provides for verification in lieu of certified copy
of a birth certificate under HRS
338-14.3.
F. Even the Hawaii Department of Home Lands does not accept a certified copy of
a birth certificate as conclusive evidence for its homestead program.
From its web site:
“In order to process your application, DHHL utilizes information that is found
only on the original Certificate of Live Birth, which is either black
or green. This is a more complete record of your birth than the Certification
of Live Birth (a computer-generated printout). Submitting the original Certificate
of Live Birth will save you time and money since the computer-generated Certification
requires additional verification by DHHL.”
Now
that we all understand that you can be born in Madagascar, Russia, Norway,
Brazil or even Kenya like Obama and still have a REAL birth
certificate that both Snopes and Factcheck
would say was real since they are real. That doesn’t mean you were born in Hawaii America
Barack Obama has as of November 27th 2008 spent over $500,000 U.S.
All
of the people born in Korea ,
Kenya , Mongolia , Australia
Yes - it is a proven fact that
Before going on with other questions that bring truth, let us ask
why he was not checked before running for President?
No
One Checks these People’s backgrounds at all?
There is in fact NO ONE that checks.
That is part of the lawsuits before the Supreme Court against the DNC as well
as Obama. All they do is ask the state
of birth if they have a real birth certificate on file and what the date of
birth is. That is ALL! This is the whole point of the matter.
Other candidates for Presidency in 2008 NOT Qualified
We even had other candidates run for the
Presidency in minor parties like this guy - who ran for President against Obama
and McCain but WAS BORN IN NICARAGUA. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/R%C3%B3ger_Calero
Understand that there is no one that makes sure like a national HR dept that
candidates are qualified. Róger
Calero was the Socialist Workers Party Candidate.
He
Ran and no one checked on his background either
Róger Calero
was also arrested for felonies - another reason that he should not have even been
allowed to even run for the Presidency in
OK, but once he was elected President, the FBI and CIA would have
done a background check on him, wouldn’t they?
Lets see what BO did the day after he was sworn
in as President.
January 21, 2009, Obama signed Executive Order 13489. This order was
entered into the Federal Register on January 26, 2009.
What this executive order says,
is that only the Attorney General (Eric
Holder) and Council to the President, (Gregory Craig) are
able to review presidential records requests and determine if they can be made
public or not. (See Section 3)
In other words, you aren’t going to see any records or documents
that Obama doesn’t want you to see….
It shouldn’t surprise anyone
that Obama’s first official act was to deny access to his records. Obama has
lived for 48 years without leaving any footprints — none! There is no Obama
documentation — no bona fides — no paper trail — nothing.
In choosing Leon E. Panetta to be the next CIA
director, President-elect Barack Obama appears to have concluded that a spy
chief who understands politics may be better equipped to carry out the incoming
The
surprise selection of Panetta, a former
OK! He has handcuffed
the CIA and FBI but he has not handcuffed us.
What about the proof he was not born in
Supposed
Conspiracy Claim Turns REAL on Obama
It is becoming painfully obvious that we may
very well have a criminal President in 2009. No
this isn’t a joke. What I speak of is the curious developments
in the supposedly racist, biased, dumb, as well
as insane case of where Obama was born. Why
the Barack Obama Birth Certificate Issue Is Legitimate
A strange development indeed is how it is that
every time Barack Obama or a family member tells of where Obama was born, they
seem to have no idea as of December 2008.
They seemed to
know what hospital quite a few times months ago when it was claimed that Obama’s
mother gave birth to him at Queens Medical
Center in Honolulu - Obama and
Mom Never Here
The Queen’s
Medical Center
1301
Phone number 808-538-9011 General
Medical Records 808-547-4361.
After it was concluded that Obama and his
mother were never there, his sister was in an interview (Mary) and claimed that
Obama was born at Kapiolani Medical Center for Women and Children - Obama and Mom Never Here 1319
Hospital
after Hospital - all Have No Record of Obama being born or Mom Ever being There.
Hospital after hospital in
We already know that Obama’s family and the entire nation of
All
of these were called or visited from November 20 - December 2nd 2008. It is
confirmed, OBAMA was not born in any hospital in Honolulu County
Hospital employees were bribed, some gave info for free.
Hospitals you can check yourself (Hint on the process: Most of the following
Hospitals didn’t exist in Honolulu County at time of Obama’s birth so this was
an academic exercise) The main two hospitals claimed that definitely existed
are above and both have no record of Obama or Mother Ann in either of them.
·
The Queen’s Medical
Center - Honolulu, Hawaii Obama claims as his
birth hospital
·
Kapi’
olani Medical Center Obama’s
sister claims Barack Obama born here
·
Honolulu Shriners Hospital
Never a patient Mom or Obama
·
Straub Clinic & Hospital Never a patient Mom or Obama
·
Hawaii Health
Systems Corporation -
·
Cancer Institute of Maui -
·
Kuakini Hospital -
·
Rehabilitation
Hospital of the Pacific -
·
St.
Francis Healthcare System of Hawaii -
·
Straub
Heatlh -
·
Tripler
Medical Center -
·
Wahiawa General Hospital - Wahiawa, Hawaii Never a patient Mom or Obama
·
Wilcox
Memorial Hospital - Lihue,
We were pretty detailed in our calls and visits thanks to dozens of
native Hawaiian patriots! To the College Republicans all over the
Only his original that he has sealed will have this info. Will the
Supreme Court force it open and thus preserve the Constitution of the
1. OBAMA ADMITTED BEING BORN
IN
AP declared Obama “Kenyan-Born”
What most people know is that
the Associated Press (AP) is one of the largest, internationally recognized,
syndicated news services. What most people don’t know that is in 2004, the AP
was a “birther” news organization.
How so? Because in a
syndicated report, published Sunday, June 27, 2004, by the Kenyan Standard
Times and which was, as of this report, available at http://web.archive.org/web/20040627142700/eastandard.net/headlines/news26060403.htm
The AP reporter stated the
following:
Kenyan-born
This report explains the
context of the oft cited debate, between Obama and Keyes in the following Fall, in which Keyes faulted Obama for not being a “natural
born citizen” and in which Obama, by his quick retort, “So what? I am running for Illinois Senator, not the presidency”,
self-admitted that he was not eligible for the office. Seeing that an AP
reporter is too professional to submit a story which was not based on confirmed
sources (ostensibly the Obama campaign in this case), the inference seems
inescapable: Obama himself was putting
out in 2004, that he was born in
The difficulty in finding this
gem of a story is hampered by Google, which is running flak for Obama: because
if you search for “Kenyan-born US Senate” you wont
find it, but if you search for the phrase without quotes you will find links
which talk about it.
For those who believe what
they see, here is the screen capture of the page from the Kenyan Sunday
Standard, electronic edition, of June 27, 2004 — Just in case that page is
scrubbed from the Web Archive:
Readers should take note that
this AP story, was syndicated world-wide, so you
should be able to find it in major newspapers, archived in libraries
world-wide. If any reader does this, please let The Post & Email know, so
that we can publish a follow up-story. You can scrub the net, but scrubbing
libraries world-wide is not so easy.
Hanen of Sentinel Blog Radio broke the public news of the existence
of this AP story at on October 14, 2009 at 12:31 pm. However, The Post &
Email can confirm that a professional investigator had uncovered this story months ago and that certified and authenticated
copies of this report, meeting Federal Rules of evidence, have already been
prepared and archived at many locations nationwide. It should be noted that on January 8, 2006, the
http://the.honoluluadvertiser.com/article/2006/Jan/08/ln/FP601080334.html
(they also retracted this article in the paper on Jan. 15 — shows that ) A Chronology of Deceit One can now ask an important
question which has not yet been emphasized enough: “Just when did Obama begin to publically claim he was born in
Regarding his claims, we can summarize what is known:
1. As of Monday, Aug. 28, 2006, Obama’s Campaign was putting out that he was
born in
This is known from the
introductory speech given by Prof. George A. O. Magoha,
Vice-Chancellor of the
2. From the newspaper reports
above, it is clear that the Obama campaign was putting out that he was born in
3. In October of 2004, during
the ABC Chicago Affiliate’s broadcast of the Obama-Keyes debates, Obama openly
admitted — he conceded — that he was not a natural born citizen. (C-Span aired
the uncut version of the debates, which contained this exchange, in the second
half of April, 2005)
4. It is known from a
classmate of Obama at
If any reader can find a link
which documents a claim to a birth location before Aug. 28th, 2006, which
differs from this timeline or which supports it; please let The Post &
Email know of it, by posting it in the comment section below.
In a follow up report, The
Post & Email has published a brief analysis of the Google Newspaper archive,
which shows that Obama’s story changed after June 27, 2004.
Finally, that the AP did cover
this story, reprinted by the East African Standard, can be seen from the
citation made to AP stories about it (Jack Ryan dropping out of the race), in
the following contemporary news articles, which however are incomplete:
June 25, 2004 — http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,123716,00.html
June 26, 2004 — Bellview News Democrat
June 26, 2004 — AP Online Story by Michael Tarm
June 25, 2004 — AP Syndicated Story by Maura Kelly Lannan
(Second Source on June 26,
2009, which cites Associated Press Special Correspondent David Espo and reporter Dennis Conrad as contributors to this
report)
(Third Source, The Ledger, print edition of June 26, 2009: partial
republication)
http://web.archive.org/web/20040627142700/eastandard.net/headlines/news26060403.htm
The
News Media
If
I can find all this information and have the guts to ask these questions, where
has the News media been? They sent hundreds of investigators to
Jim
Neugent wrote to ABC because of their coverage and
support of a woman who wanted to marry another woman but her son was against
it. ABC made the son look like a
whiner. Neugent
then went on to reference the bible. This is what ABC answered him.
“How
about getting your nose out of the Bible (which is ONLY a
book of stories compiled by MANY
different writers hundreds of years ago) and read the declaration of
independence (what our nation is built on), where it says 'All Men
are Created equal,' and try treating them that way for a change!
“Or
better yet, try thinking for yourself and stop using an archaic book of stories
as your lame crutch for your existence. You are in the minority in this
country, and your boycott will not affect
us at ABC or our freedom of statement.”
The Truth about Climate Change
HERE are the 100 reasons, released in a dossier issued by the European
Foundation, why climate change is natural and not man-made:
1) There is “no real scientific proof” that the current warming is
caused by the rise of greenhouse gases from man’s activity.
2) Man-made carbon dioxide
emissions throughout human history constitute less than 0.00022 percent of the
total naturally emitted from the mantle of the earth during geological history.
3)
Warmer periods of the Earth’s history came around 800 years before rises in CO2
levels.
4) After World War II, there was a huge surge
in recorded CO2 emissions but global temperatures fell for four decades after
1940.
5) Throughout the Earth’s history,
temperatures have often been warmer than now and CO2 levels have often been
higher – more than ten times as high.
6) Significant changes in climate
have continually occurred throughout geologic time.
7) The 0.7C increase in the average global
temperature over the last hundred years is entirely consistent with
well-established, long-term, natural climate trends.
8) The IPCC theory is driven by just 60 scientists and favourable
reviewers not the 4,000 usually cited.
9) Leaked e-mails from British climate
scientists – in a scandal known as “Climate-gate” - suggest that that has been
manipulated to exaggerate global warming
10) A large body of scientific research
suggests that the sun is responsible for the greater share of climate change
during the past hundred years.
11) Politicians and activiists
claim rising sea levels are a direct cause of global warming but sea levels
rates have been increasing steadily since the last ice age 10,000 ago
12) Philip Stott, Emeritus Professor of
Biogeography at the School of Oriental and African Studies in London says
climate change is too complicated to be caused by just one factor, whether CO2
or clouds
13) Peter Lilley MP said last month that “fewer
people in Britain than in any other country believe in the importance of global
warming. That is despite the fact that our Government and our political
class—predominantly—are more committed to it than their counterparts in any
other country in the world”.
14) In pursuit of the global warming rhetoric,
wind farms will do very little to nothing to reduce CO2 emissions
15) Professor Plimer,
Professor of Geology and Earth Sciences at the University of Adelaide, stated
that the idea of taking a single trace gas in the atmosphere, accusing it and
finding it guilty of total responsibility for climate change, is an “absurdity”
16) A Harvard University astrophysicist and
geophysicist, Willie Soon, said he is “embarrassed and puzzled” by the shallow
science in papers that support the proposition that the earth faces a climate
crisis caused by global warming.
17) The science of what determines the
earth’s temperature is in fact far from settled or understood.
18) Despite activist concerns over CO2 levels,
CO2 is a minor greenhouse gas, unlike water vapor which is tied to climate
concerns, and which we can’t even pretend to control
19) A petition by scientists trying to tell the
world that the political and media portrayal of global warming is false was put
forward in the Heidelberg Appeal in 1992. Today, more than 4,000 signatories,
including 72 Nobel Prize winners, from 106 countries have signed it.
20) It is claimed the average global
temperature increased at a dangerously fast rate in the 20th century but the
recent rate of average global temperature rise has been between 1 and 2 degrees
C per century - within natural rates
21) Professor Zbigniew
Jaworowski, Chairman of the Scientific Council of the
Central Laboratory for Radiological Protection in Warsaw, Poland says the
earth’s temperature has more to do with cloud cover and water vapor than CO2
concentration in the atmosphere.
22) There is strong evidence from solar
studies which suggests that the Earth’s current temperature stasis will be
followed by climatic cooling over the next few decades
23) It is myth that receding glaciers are proof
of global warming as glaciers have been receding and growing cyclically for
many centuries
24) It is a falsehood that the earth’s poles
are warming because that is natural variation and while the western Arctic may
be getting somewhat warmer we also see that the Eastern Arctic and Greenland are getting colder
25) The IPCC claims climate driven “impacts
on biodiversity are significant and of key relevance” but those claims are
simply not supported by scientific research
26) The IPCC threat of climate change to the
world’s species does not make sense as wild species are at least one million
years old, which means they have all been through hundreds of climate cycles
27) Research goes strongly against claims that
CO2-induced global warming would cause catastrophic disintegration of the
Greenland and Antarctic Ice Sheets.
28) Despite activist concerns over CO2 levels, rising CO2 levels are our best hope of
raising crop yields to feed an ever-growing population
29) The biggest climate change ever
experienced on earth took place around 700 million years ago
30) The slight increase in temperature which has
been observed since 1900 is entirely consistent with well-established,
long-term natural climate cycles
31) Despite activist concerns over CO2 levels, rising CO2 levels of some so-called
“greenhouse gases” may be contributing to higher oxygen levels and global
cooling, not warming
32) Accurate satellite, balloon and
mountain top observations made over the last three decades have not shown any
significant change in the long term rate of increase in global temperatures
33) Today’s CO2 concentration of around 385 ppm is very low compared to most of the earth’s history – we actually live in a carbon-deficient
atmosphere
34) It is a myth that CO2 is the most common
greenhouse gas because greenhouse gases form about 3% of the atmosphere by
volume, and CO2 constitutes about 0.037%
of the atmosphere
35) It is a myth that computer models verify
that CO2 increases will cause significant global warming because computer models can be made to “verify”
anything
36) There is no scientific or statistical
evidence whatsoever that global warming will cause more storms and other
weather extremes
37) One statement deleted from a UN report in
1996 stated that “none of the studies cited above has shown clear evidence that
we can attribute the observed climate changes to increases in greenhouse gases”
38) The world “warmed” by 0.07 +/- 0.07 degrees
C from 1999 to 2008, not the 0.20 degrees C expected by the IPCC
39) The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate
Change says “it is likely that future tropical cyclones (typhoons and
hurricanes) will become more intense” but there has been no increase in the
intensity or frequency of tropical cyclones globally
40) Rising CO2 levels in the atmosphere can
be shown not only to have a negligible effect on the Earth’s many ecosystems,
but in some cases to be a positive help to many organisms
41) Researchers who compare and contrast climate
change impact on civilizations found warm periods are beneficial to mankind and
cold periods harmful
42) The Met Office asserts we are in the hottest
decade since records began but this is precisely what the world should expect
if the climate is cyclical
43)
Rising CO2 levels increase plant growth and make plants more resistant to
drought and pests
44) The
historical increase in the air’s CO2 content has improved human nutrition by
raising crop yields during the past 150 years
45) The
increase of the air’s CO2 content has probably helped lengthen human lifespans since the beginning of the Industrial Revolution
46) The IPCC alleges that “climate change
currently contributes to the global burden of disease and premature deaths” but
the evidence shows that higher temperatures and rising CO2 levels has helped
global populations
47) In May of 2004, the Russian Academy of
Sciences published a report concluding that the Kyoto Protocol has no
scientific grounding at all.
48) The “Climate-gate” scandal pointed to a
expensive public campaign of disinformation and the denigration of scientists
who opposed the belief that CO2 emissions were causing climate change
49) The head of Britain’s climate change
watchdog has predicted households will need to spend up to £15,000 on a full
energy efficiency makeover if the Government is to meet its ambitious targets
for cutting carbon emissions.
50) Wind power is unlikely to be the answer
to our energy needs. The wind power industry argues that there are “no direct
subsidies” but it involves a total subsidy of as much as £60 per MWh which falls directly on electricity consumers. This
burden will grow in line with attempts to achieve Wind power targets, according
to a recent OFGEM report.
51) Wind farms are not an efficient way to
produce energy. The British Wind Energy Association (BWEA) accepts a figure of
75 per cent back-up power is required.
52) Global temperatures are below the low end of
IPCC predictions not at “at the top end of IPCC estimates”
53) Climate alarmists have raised the concern
over acidification of the oceans but Tom Segalstad
from Oslo University in Norway , and others, have
noted that the composition of ocean water – including CO2, calcium, and water –
can act as a buffering agent in the acidification of the oceans.
54) The UN’s IPCC
computer models of human-caused global warming predict the emergence of a
“hotspot” in the upper troposphere over the tropics. Former researcher in
the Australian Department of Climate Change, David Evans, said there is no
evidence of such a hotspot
55) The argument
that climate change is a of result of global warming caused by human activity
is the argument of flat Earthers.
56) The manner in which
57) William Kininmonth,
a former head of the National Climate Centre and a consultant to the World
Meteorological Organisation, wrote “the likely extent of global temperature
rise from a doubling of CO2 is less than 1C. Such warming is well within the
envelope of variation experienced during the past 10,000 years and
insignificant in the context of glacial cycles during the past million years,
when Earth has been predominantly very cold and covered by extensive ice
sheets.”
58)
59) In the lead up to the Copenhagen summit,
David Davis MP said of previous climate summits, at Rio de Janeiro in 1992 and
Kyoto in 1997 that many had promised greater cuts, but “neither happened”, but
we are continuing along the same lines.
60) The
61) The UN’s panel on
climate change warned that Himalayan glaciers could melt to a fifth of current
levels by 2035. J. Graham Cogley a professor at
62) Under existing
63) It is claimed that the average global
temperature was relatively unchanging in pre-industrial times but sky-rocketed
since 1900, and will increase by several degrees more over the next 100 years
according to
64) Michael Mann of
65) The globe’s current approach to climate
change in which major industrialised countries agree
to nonsensical targets for their CO2 emissions by a given date, as it has been
under the
66) The “Climate-gate” scandal revealed that
a scientific team had emailed one another about using a “trick” for the sake of
concealing a “decline” in temperatures when looking at the history of the
Earth’s temperature.
67) Global
temperatures have not risen in any statistically-significant sense for 15 years
and have actually been falling for nine years. The “Climate-gate” scandal
revealed a scientific team had expressed dismay at the fact global warming was
contrary to their predictions and admitted their inability to explain it was “a
travesty”.
68) The IPCC predicts that a warmer planet will
lead to more extreme weather, including drought, flooding, storms, snow, and
wildfires. But over the last century, during which the IPCC claims the world
experienced more rapid warming than any time in the past two millennia, the
world did not experience significantly greater trends in any of these extreme
weather events.
69) In explaining the average temperature
standstill we are currently experiencing, the Met Office Hadley Centre ran a
series of computer climate predictions and found in many of the computer runs
there were decade-long standstills but none for 15 years – so it expects global
warming to resume swiftly.
70) Richard Lindzen,
Professor of Atmospheric Sciences at Massachusetts Institute of Technology,
wrote: “The notion of a static, unchanging climate is foreign to the history of
the Earth or any other planet with a fluid envelope. Such hysteria (over
global warming) simply represents the scientific illiteracy of much of the
public, the susceptibility of the public to the substitution of repetition for
truth.”
71) Despite the 1997 Kyoto Protocol’s status as
the flagship of the fight against climate change it has been a failure.
72) The first phase of the EU’s Emissions
Trading Scheme (ETS), which ran from 2005 to 2007 was
a failure. Huge over-allocation of permits to pollute led to a collapse in the
price of carbon from €33 to just €0.20 per tonne
meaning the system did not reduce emissions at all.
73) The EU trading scheme, to manage carbon
emissions has completely failed and actually allows European businesses to duck
out of making their emissions reductions at home by offsetting, which means
paying for cuts to be made overseas instead.
74) To date “cap and trade” carbon markets have
done almost nothing to reduce emissions.
75) In the
76) Dr Roy Spencer, a principal research
scientist at the University of Alabama in Huntsville, has indicated that out of
the 21 climate models tracked by the IPCC the differences in warming exhibited
by those models is mostly the result of different strengths of positive cloud
feedback – and that increasing CO2 is insufficient to explain global-average
warming in the last 50 to 100 years.
77) Why should politicians devote our scarce
resources in a globally competitive world to a false and ill-defined problem,
while ignoring the real problems the entire planet faces, such as: poverty,
hunger, disease or terrorism.
78) A
proper analysis of ice core records from the past 650,000 years demonstrates
that temperature increases have come before, and not resulted from, increases
in CO2 by hundreds of years.
79) Since the cause of global warming is
mostly natural, then there is in actual fact very little we can do about it.
(We are still not able to control the sun).
80) A substantial number of the panel of 2,500
climate scientists on the United Nation’s International Panel on Climate
Change, which created a statement on scientific unanimity on climate change and
man-made global warming, were found to have serious concerns.
81) The
82) Politicians and activists push for
renewable energy sources such as wind turbines under the rhetoric of climate
change, but it is essentially about money – under the system of Renewable
Obligations. Much of the money is paid for by consumers in electricity bills.
It amounts to £1 billion a year.
83) The “Climate-gate” scandal revealed that a
scientific team had tampered with their own data so as to conceal
inconsistencies and errors.
84) The “Climate-gate” scandal revealed that
a scientific team had campaigned for the removal of a learned journal’s editor,
solely because he did not share their willingness to debase science for
political purposes.
85) Ice-core data clearly show that temperatures
change centuries before concentrations of atmospheric CO2 change. Thus, there
appears to be little evidence for insisting that changes in concentrations of
CO2 are the cause of past temperature and climate change.
86) There are no experimentally verified
processes explaining how CO2 concentrations can fall in a few centuries without
falling temperatures – in fact it is changing temperatures which cause changes
in CO2 concentrations, which is consistent with experiments that show CO2 is
the atmospheric gas most readily absorbed by water.
87) The Government’s Renewable Energy Strategy
contains a massive increase in electricity generation by wind power costing
around £4 billion a year over the next twenty years. The benefits will be only
£4 to £5 billion overall (not per annum). So
costs will outnumber benefits by a range of between eleven and seventeen times.
88) Whilst CO2 levels have indeed changed
for various reasons, human and otherwise, just as they have throughout history,
the CO2 content of the atmosphere has increased since the beginning of the
industrial revolution, and the growth rate has now been constant for the past
25 years.
89) It
is a myth that CO2 is a pollutant, because nitrogen forms 80% of our atmosphere
and human beings could not live in 100% nitrogen either: CO2 is no more a
pollutant than nitrogen is and CO2 is essential to life.
90) Politicians and climate activists
make claims to rising sea levels but certain members in the IPCC chose an area
to measure in
91) The accepted global average temperature
statistics used by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change show that no
ground-based warming has occurred since 1998.
92) If one factors in non-greenhouse
influences such as El Nino events and large volcanic eruptions, lower atmosphere
satellite-based temperature measurements show little, if any, global warming
since 1979, a period over which atmospheric CO2 has increased by 55 ppm (17 per cent).
93)
94) The European Union has already agreed
to cut emissions by 20 percent to 2020, compared with 1990 levels, and is
willing to increase the target to 30 percent. However, these are unachievable
and the EU has already massively failed with its Emissions Trading Scheme
(ETS), as EU emissions actually rose by 0.8 percent from 2005 to 2006 and are
known to be well above the
95)
96) Canada plans to reduce emissions by
20 percent compared with 2006 levels by 2020, representing approximately a 3
percent cut from 1990 levels but it simultaneously defends its Alberta tar
sands emissions and its record as one of the world’s highest per-capita
emissions setters.
97) India plans to reduce the ratio of
emissions to production by 20-25 percent compared with 2005 levels by 2020, but
all Government officials insist that since India has to grow for its
development and poverty alleviation, it has to emit, because the economy is
driven by carbon.
98) The Leipzig Declaration in 1996, was
signed by 110 scientists who said: “We – along with many of our fellow citizens
– are apprehensive about the climate treaty conference scheduled for Kyoto,
Japan, in December 1997” and “based on all the evidence available to us, we
cannot subscribe to the politically inspired world view that envisages climate
catastrophes and calls for hasty actions.”
99) A US Oregon Petition Project stated “We
urge the United States government to reject the global warming agreement that
was written in Kyoto, Japan in December, 1997, and any other similar proposals.
The proposed limits on greenhouse gases would harm the environment, hinder the
advance of science and technology, and damage the health and welfare of
mankind. There is no convincing scientific evidence that human release of CO2,
methane, or other greenhouse gasses is causing or will, in the foreseeable
future, cause catastrophic heating of the Earth’s atmosphere and disruption of
the Earth’s climate.”
100) A report by the Nongovernmental
International Panel on Climate Change concluded “We find no support for the IPCC’s claim that climate observations during the twentieth
century are either unprecedented or provide evidence of an anthropogenic effect
on climate.”
What we must do now and in
November of 2010
What we can do now is try to do
in your states what
Before November of 2010 we
must run people in the primaries who will fight for
our soverency and freedoms from government. If democrats and Republicans are not willing
throw them out.
But mark my word, the thing that will cause the next American Revolution will be the massive election fraud in
2010, which they are planning right now.