DOJ Facilitating Massive Voter Fraud
Richard Salbato - July 20, 2010
I believe that Eric Holder is telling liberal
“community organizers” that he will not prosecute any voter fraud in the 2010
elections. These “community organizers”
(Obama’s expertise) know they will not be prosecuted and are working hard to
but together manpower, money and plans
to steal the next election. They
know they will not be prosecuted.
Even with massive conservative votes the
taking of the House and Senate will be very, very close and any voter fraud
could be major.
That is a drastic claim on my part. Let us look at how I come to this
conclusion.
The new head of the CIA was the first
appointment of Barak Obama, and within 12 days of his Presidency, his second
appointment was Eric Holder as Attorney General of the Department of Justice which
many think is the top law enforcement officer of the Nation. Since the FBI is
under the DOJ, the two appointments are the two people in charge of Justice in
the Federal Government and the only two who can investigate the Federal Government
itself.
I am now realizing why these two
appointments were the first two things he did in his first 12 days. With the Interstate
Commerce Act of 1887, the DOJ took on some law enforcement responsibilities. His authority does not counter the authority
of the states, except in interstate commerce laws. However, in practice the DOJ
has been considered the top law enforcer of the land.
Within days of the election massive voter
fraud was presented to the DOJ but Eric Holder refused to investigate any of
them.
When
you consider that most likely Hilary Clinton won the primary against BO, and
that Al Franken did not win the Senate Seat, and the Black Panthers not being
prosecuted, and the Indianapolis/Marion County large numbers of ineligible voters who have
died, moved away or are registered more than once in an active ACORN area but
DOJ refuses to even investigate, and the Motor Voter fraud case, where ATG
Julie Fernandes, said in front of a large group of Voting
Section employees,
“We have no interest in enforcing this provision of
the law. It has nothing to do with increasing turnout, and we are just not
going to do it.”
What would you
think?
Consider BO supporters in
Consider the sHare Scan voting machines which produce massive voter
fraud and the DOJ refuses to investigate it.
Consider that
up to six states already have said they will pass a law that demands that their
ELECTORIAL COLLEGE will be required to vote for the candidate that gets the
national majority vote, and this violates the constitution but will most likely
not be investigated or challenged. This
would give four states the power to elect the President.
When you
consider what they refuse to investigate and/or refuse to prosecute, do you not
see that they are telling those who violate voter laws that they will not
prosecute them?
Add to that
that the DOJ has filed a law suit again
This election
will be close because there are so many seats that can change but whoever wins
the majority it will be by only one or two seats. Fraud in one state can change everything.
Voter Fraud – Al Franken
The group's
recently published report found that hundreds of felons voted in the election
in which Al Franken, a Democrat, beat then-incumbent Republican Sen. Norm
Coleman by just 312 votes out of more than 3 million cast -- a margin that was determined
after six months of legal challenges and recounts.
The report, using public election records, state felony conviction
documents and hand-sorted searches of voting rosters, found “irrefutable
evidence” that hundreds of felons voted illegally in the election, and that the
number of felons whose votes were wrongly counted exceeded the margin by which
Franken beat Coleman.
“If the feds had done their job and ensured that the voting records were up
to date, things would have turned out very differently,” McGrath said.
McGrath charged that efforts to get the federal government involved, even
after the election, were met with a wall of silence, despite letters and a
meeting with the FBI.
“We sent two letters to the United States Justice Department detailing the
problem and met with the FBI, and nothing happened,” he said.
Among the early findings submitted to the
Department of Justice in the first letter, dated Nov. 17, 2008, were that
thousands more votes were cast than voter records supported, and that the
registration rolls contained thousands more voters who had died, moved away,
were registered at vacant lots or were undocumented aliens. Those charges, sent
to the Justice Department in the waning days of the Bush
Two months later, "just as the
A second letter, sent in October 2009 as results of
the study began to emerge, also requested a federal investigation, It too was never answered.
E.K. Wilson, spokesman for
the FBI in
Voter Fraud – Dead People Voting
Say
Anything notes that Indianapolis/Marion County seems to have more people
registered to vote in 2007 then its actual adult citizen population. Even
though they only had 644,197 voting age-eligible individuals, there were
677,401 individuals registered to vote, or 105% of the Census population.
It should come
as no surprise to anyone that the registration list in Indianapolis/Marion
County still has large numbers of ineligible voters – people who have died or moved away, are registered more than once, are
not citizens or perhaps don’t even exist given ACORN’s
activities there.
After all, when
the U.S. Supreme Court upheld
As the Supreme
Court recognized, Motor Voter has provisions “restricting States’ ability to
remove names from the lists of registered voters.” In fact, its restrictions
and notice provisions are so strict that many states simply stopped doing
anything to clean up their voter rolls after Motor Voter became law.
Section 8 of
Motor Voter does contain a provision requiring states to conduct a general program
of “list maintenance” that identifies and removes the names of ineligible
voters. However, the U.S. Department of Justice never filed a single lawsuit
against any state to enforce this provision until 2005, when it finally filed a
lawsuit against
Yet the Bush
Administration and particularly its Civil Rights Division were subjected to
withering criticism by Congress and many traditional civil rights organizations
for filing these suits that were unfairly characterized as an attempt to supposedly
purge minorities and “suppress voting.”
It seems clear
from this report about the voter registration list in Indianapolis/Marion
County that they have still not fully complied with the requirement to clean up
their voter rolls. All of us should be concerned about this because the larger
the pool of invalid names on voter registration rolls, the greater the
probabilities that fraudulent votes will be cast in those names by unscrupulous
individuals in the upcoming election.
Voter Fraud – Race Preference
I was at the
Voting Section of the Justice Department for over five years. This office is
responsible for enforcing most federal election laws which do not involve
criminal matters. My previous articles
at Pajamas Media have spoken of the
DOJ’s lawless abandonment of race-neutral enforcement of voting laws, and
other outrageous conduct. I will continue to publish here at Pajamas Media more
instances of failure to enforce the law equally by the Department.
One such
instance relates to the Motor Voter law, and will shock Americans who care
about integrity in the electoral process.
The “Motor
Voter” law was passed in 1993 to promote greater voter registration in the
A lesser-known
provision also obliged the states to ensure that no ineligible voters were on
the rolls — including dead people, felons, and people who had moved. Our
current Department of Justice is anxious to encourage the obligations to get
everyone registered, but explicitly
unwilling to enforce federal law requiring states to remove the dead or
ineligible from the rolls.
In November
2009, the entire Voting Section was invited to a meeting with Deputy Assistant
Attorney General Julie Fernandes, a political
employee serving at the pleasure of the attorney general. The purpose of the
meeting was to discuss Motor Voter enforcement decisions.
The room was
packed with dozens of Voting Section employees when she made her announcement regarding
the provisions related to voter list integrity:
We have no interest in enforcing this provision of
the law. It has nothing to do with increasing turnout, and we are just not
going to do it.
Jaws dropped
around the room.
It is one thing
to silently adopt a lawless policy of refusing to enforce a provision of
federal law designed to bring integrity to elections. It is quite another to
announce the lawlessness to a room full of people who have sworn an oath to
fairly enforce the law.
Worse yet, it
is a broken campaign promise by Barack Obama, and I’m sure he would not be
happy to have heard the announcement. After all, his Assistant Attorney General
Tom Perez has been traveling around the country bashing the Bush-era Department
of Justice. Perez says as often as he can:
Those who had
been entrusted with the keys to the division treated it like a buffet line at
the cafeteria, cherry-picking which laws
to enforce.
Yet at this
meeting, Ms. Fernandes openly relished her time at
the buffet line in the Voting Section cafeteria.
The problem
with this sort of lawlessness, apart from the fact that it is becoming a trend
in this administration, is that it nullifies the important compromise that
Congress reached in 1993. Greater access to registration came by turning welfare agencies into voter
registration offices, but the law also included provisions to ensure
greater integrity. It is a dangerous development for our electoral system when
one part of that compromise is tossed overboard by a bureaucrat.
It will be impossible
for this purportedly transparent administration to deny this direction was
given. There were dozens of good people in the room that I know care more about
the truth than about saving Ms. Fernandes’ career.
Plus, the cases
the Justice Department has brought — or not brought — corroborate the account: the Department has not filed a single
case under the Motor Voter provision where there are problems.
Are there
problems with list integrity? Yes, but that’s a story for another article. Even
worse than not bringing cases, the Holder Justice Department has dismissed a
case against
The blame-Bush
instincts of this administration will no doubt lead to talk about all the cases
the Bush DOJ didn’t bring to open up public welfare agencies to voter
registration. Good luck. I’d suggest citizens go online and see the Section 7
NVRA, or “Motor Voter,” cases that were commenced under the Bush
administration. Bush brought voter registration cases under Motor Voter against
This Justice
Department, in contrast, has “cherry picked” which parts of Motor Voter law
they will enforce. You wouldn’t think it
has anything to do with politics or the upcoming elections, would you?
J.
Christian Adams is an election lawyer who served in the Voting Rights Section
at the
Voter
Fraud –
More crimes by
BO supporters in
Voter Fraud – Motor Voter
The enormousness of the problem in
·
The number of registered voters
threatens to outnumber the voting age population. A total of 247,135
·
Almost 70,000
·
More than 23,000 people on
·
Though dead for 10 years, St.
Louis Alderman Albert "Red" Villa actually registered to vote this
spring in the city's mayoral primary. Ritzy Mekler, a
mixed breed dog, was also registered to vote in
·
We saw an Election Day lawsuit
filed to keep the city polls open late because the plaintiff feared he wouldn't
get a chance to vote. Then it turned out the plaintiff was a dead man. When he
was replaced by a live
You may call me cruel and even
discriminatory, but I will persist in trying to limit the voting franchise to
human beings who are not dead yet. Clearly the city of
For example, the motor voter act blocks
states from requiring notarization or another form of authentication on mail-in
registration cards. Why do we so easily require photo ID to board a plane or to
buy beer and cigarettes while leaving the ballot box so undefended?
In addition, once registered, it is
almost impossible to get off the lists. Current federal law blocks a person's
removal from the voter rolls unless he or she is (1) reported dead, (2)
requests removal or (3) the U.S. Postal Service returns certified election
board mailings to the person as "undeliverable" and the person fails
to vote in two successive federal elections.
Congress passed the motor voter bill
with the best intentions. Unfortunately, we now have proof that the very
mechanism used to boost voter participation has turned the nation's voter rolls
into a tangled mess.
In
In
The legacy of the motor voter bill is
that it boosted voter participation while reducing the integrity of and
confidence in our elections. The best election "reform" Congress can
undertake this year is to go back and fix the flaws in the law we passed seven
years ago.
Voter Fraud – Intimidation
Crimes by BHO
supporters in
Voter Fraud – Hart eScan
Voting Machines
It was Stalin
who said “it’s not the people who vote
who decide elections, it’s the people who count the votes!!?”
Hart eScan voting machines, which
violate your Constitutional rights by concealing essential counting processes from
the public, can easily be manipulated by anyone with inside access to alter
election outcomes.
People using the Hart system can alter election
results from almost any part of it -- the precinct machines, the Tally software
that add up the votes from precincts, the "Rally" software which is designed
to communicate with a higher level center, for example, at the state level --
in Ohio this system interfaces with the Secretary of State office.
Tuesday May 18 primary election. These computerized machines use paper ballots, but no electionprocedure compares the
real paper ballots with the computerized count.
The state of
See for yourself. Here is a link to the Hart section of the report:
www.blackboxvoting.org/hartreport.pdf
These machines, which violate your Constitutional rights by
concealing essential counting processes from the public, can easily be
manipulated by anyone with inside access to alter election outcomes.
People using the Hart system can alter election results from
almost any part of it -- the precinct machines, the Tally software that add up
the votes from precincts, the "Rally" software which is designed to
communicate with a higher level center, for example, at the state level -- in
Ohio this system interfaces with the Secretary of State office. (Note that in
As a national elections watchdog organization, we find
Recommendations: Please read excerpts from the formal, government-sponsored
reports on this system.
If you ask questions about this, you will be told the system is
safe. It is NOT!
1. Have someone watching the "TALLY" system. There is a manual
entry function which allows an election worker to overwrite election results at
the end of the day, while results from different precincts are being
aggregated.
Videotape the face of the screen and keyboard and remainattentive if anyone attempts to use the manual entry
function.
2. The Hart scanners produce a file which contains photocopies, or
scans, of each ballot. Under
3. Under
4. Make a list of polling places. Poll workers are required to
post the machine tallies at each polling place when the polls close. Get a
posse together to visit each polling place and videotape or photograph the
tapes. Note that the precinct machines can be made to produce false results, but
also the central machine can falsify results. If
only the central machine is used for falsification, the posted precinct results won't match the tally.
Mismatched results have been found in
5. Note that almost all elections in
6. If you ask, you will likely find that your county has also
purchased a Hart "BallotNow" machine. This
system can produce an unlimited supply of extra ballots in-house. In recounts, crooked
locations have been caught substituting ballots. (In the state of
Voter Fraud – Don’t Investigate
·
The
Patriot's Flag » Racism at the DOJ
·
Lawlessness
at the DOJ? | Political Byline
·
Obama’s
“Justice” Department OK With Voter Fraud » Blogs For Victory
·
Kayak2U Blog » Blog
Archive » Obama’s Funhouse of Justice
·
Lawlessness
at the DOJ: Voting Section Told Not To Enforce Purging the Dead - Old Hippie's
Forums
·
What
Is Going On At The DOJ? : NO QUARTER
·
AZ Ceded to Mexico and the
Rise of the Obama Police State? | Redneck Politics
·
NEW
BLACK PANTHER PARTY CASE UNFOLDS « North Houston Tea Party
·
Arizona
Ceded to Mexico and the Rise of the Obama Police State? | The Post & Email
·
Shavings | Thinking in
Christ
·
Hot
Air » Nuclear war: Megyn Kelly vs. Kirsten Powers
over Black Panther case
Voter Fraud – More on DOJ
·
The
Patriot's Flag » Racism at the DOJ
·
Lawlessness
at the DOJ? | Political Byline
·
Obama’s
“Justice” Department OK With Voter Fraud » Blogs For Victory
·
Kayak2U Blog » Blog
Archive » Obama’s Funhouse of Justice
·
Lawlessness
at the DOJ: Voting Section Told Not To Enforce Purging the Dead - Old Hippie's
Forums
·
What
Is Going On At The DOJ? : NO QUARTER
·
AZ Ceded to Mexico and the
Rise of the Obama Police State? | Redneck Politics
·
NEW
BLACK PANTHER PARTY CASE UNFOLDS « North Houston Tea Party
·
Arizona
Ceded to Mexico and the Rise of the Obama Police State? | The Post & Email
·
Shavings | Thinking in
Christ
·
Hot
Air » Nuclear war: Megyn Kelly vs. Kirsten Powers
over Black Panther case
Poll Watching or Revolution
We
all need to start volunteering to check voter registration, check mail-in
votes, and poll watch. (I might add, we need to always
be ready to record any Bartle Bull-like intimidation as seen in the infamous
Philly video). We all need to communicate like we are doing on these pages to
share and spread facts, but it’s not enough.
In
the immortal words of the 60s, if you’re not part of the solution, you’re part
of the problem. The Nov. election will be fraught with fraud if we all assume a
fair election. EVERYONE needs to become involved in “ACORN Watch”–no matter
what ACORN calls itself now–or the 2nd 2 years of Obamanation
will make the 1st 2 look mild.
We need to do
this Saul Alinsky-like “community organizing” right
back at them or the real
When honest
citizens are no longer able to rely on the integrity of their government there
is only one recourse – full-fledged anarchy. If the
problem ain’t fixed soon, unfortunately that
will be the only thing left for us to do.
Get involved.
Run for office at the local and state levels or work hard for those who do.
It’s a very large country. Corruption in large cities and whole regions of the
country is hardly new, and yet, governing parties have come and gone many, many
times for more than 200 years. I don’t believe, nor should you, that any
current party is so well organized that they can hold power in the face of an
electorate determined that they should not.
All the tools
are there: Local and state parties and offices are more important than they’ve
been made out by a celebrity soaked media culture. States’ representatives in
DC can not survive without the support of their local electorates. The more
that like minded local electorates share and compare notes, the more easily
their representative can brought to heel.
The next time
you see your local congress critter ask them this: How many of the local
electorate serve on their staff in DC? If it’s not a majority, with that majority holding the top
positions, why not? If you don’t know the people that actually do the
work in your congress critter’s office, do you think they know you? Do you
think they care about you or your concerns between elections?
You want
change? Put a tight leash on all your representatives. But that will require a
lot of effort. If you’re not up to it, then don’t complain.
When more and
more injured parties (lost jobs/wages; healthcare rationing; financial
institutions) come forth and use the Hawaii elections guy for witness to bring
cases re: Obama’s ineligibility to be POTUS, with willing judges like the one
who disallowed the moratorium on drilling, then all these illegal orders re:
healthcare, finance, homeland security, immigration, etc. will be made null and
void. His locked up records will have to be called out in discovery and they
will more than likely show a background of all types of falsehoods – perhaps
not even a citizen to this day! When it hits where it hurts, more and more just
might get more interested in these facts.
This would all
end so quickly if we could get everyone to focus on his ineligibility. We would
have him out of the WH immediately, and all of this could be reversed. Why do
people want to continue doing it the hard way? And in the meantime, he makes
things worse. Why not use the easy and certain way to get rid of him: demand
his removal because his father was not a
It is time
(while we still have a conservative majority on SCOTUS) to form Citizen Grand
Juries in our local counties and indict BO & his co-conspirators in our
State Courts for crimes committed by his campaign in 2007 & 2008.
Supreme Court – Has Power
Newsmax.com
recently reported:
“One thing
appears certain: Supreme Court Justice John Roberts isn’t likely to back down
to Obama. Roberts reportedly still is angry over President Obama’s decision to
use the State of the Union address to scold the justices for their Citizens
United v. FEC ruling, which rejected limitations on corporate and nonprofit
electioneering.
When
Obama said during the State of the Union address that the ruling would “open
the floodgates” to donations by foreign companies and other special interests
to influence
The president’s
decision to use his bully pulpit to frame the ruling’s political impact
incorrectly may have caused lasting damage to his relationship with the
judiciary. The Los Angeles Times reported on Tuesday that “Chief Justice John
Roberts Jr. is still angered by what he saw as a highly partisan insult to the
independent judiciary.”
The Los Angeles
Times reported Monday that a number of legal scholars now consider a clash
between the expansive pro-government plans of the Obama administration and the
Roberts court to be inevitable.”
For information
on forming a Secret Grand Jury to investigate crimes go here:
http://grandjury.blogtownhall.com
http://thesteadydrip.blogspot.com/2009/06/how-to-start-and-lead-citizens-grand.html
For information
on Crimes committed by the BO campaign:
http://citizenwells.wordpress.com/category/nashville/
As in Marbury, We the People shall prosecute our cases against
Barrack Hussein Obama petitioning the United States Supreme Court for a Writ of
Mandamus compelling Barrack Hussein Obama to abide by the Constitutional
Contract that he entered into with We the People on January 20, 2009 and uphold
his Oath to abide by the Supreme Law of the Land, the Constitution of the
United States of America.
It is stated in
“The office of a writ of mandamus is to compel the performance of a duty
resting upon the person to whom the writ is sent. That duty may have originated
in one way or in another. It may, as alleged in the present case, have arisen
from the acceptance of an office which has imposed the duty upon its incumbent.
But no matter out of what fact or relations the duty has grown, what the law
requires, and what it seeks to enforce by a writ of mandamus, is the personal
obligation of the individual to whom it addresses the writ.”
Following much
good faith research regarding the issue of original jurisdiction in the Supreme
Court of the United States, We the People have found no cases in the history of
jurisprudence of the United States of America wherein a Defendant disputed the
Constitutional fact that the Supreme Court of the United States has original
jurisdiction over “all Cases affecting Ambassadors, other public Ministers and
Consuls” as plainly stated in the Constitution of the United States, Article
III, Section 2.
That being the
case, “We the People” respectfully request that the Barack Hussein Obama
stipulate to the fact that the Supreme Court of the United States has original
jurisdiction over all Cases affecting Ambassadors, other public Ministers and
Consuls; or, in the alternative, that Barack Hussein Obama show good cause why
the Supreme Court of the United States shall not have original jurisdiction
LONG TERM SOLUTIONS
By Bev Harris
In
This was done in 2010 by the town of
In
There is no reason to conceal vote-counting from the public. It is
a human rights violation, because freedom is a human right. If you cannot
select your own governors through public elections, you are not free. If
essential election processes are concealed from you, the elections are NOT
public, but are controlled by insiders, which is actually a transfer of power.
These are simple concepts, but implementing them can feel
overwhelming. Nevertheless, people are succeeding, overseas and also here in
the
We wish you the best in the upcoming election. I will be here in
Yours Truly,
Bev Harris - Founder and Director - Black Box Voting, Inc. -
206-335-7747
See Black Box Voting and Bev Harris in action: HBO Emmy-nominated documentary, Hacking Democracy, is viewable
for free on YouTube and we will send you an official HBO DVD of the film with donations
of $100 or more. Our monthly expenses run about $11,000, which includes
salaries, communications, Web site, and travel. Our total nest egg is currently
about $36,000. We would like to be here for the critically important elections
in November. One substantial donation from you makes a real impact on