DOJ Facilitating Massive Voter Fraud
Richard Salbato - July 20, 2010
I believe that Eric Holder is telling liberal “community organizers” that he will not prosecute any voter fraud in the 2010 elections. These “community organizers” (Obama’s expertise) know they will not be prosecuted and are working hard to but together manpower, money and plans to steal the next election. They know they will not be prosecuted.
Even with massive conservative votes the taking of the House and Senate will be very, very close and any voter fraud could be major.
That is a drastic claim on my part. Let us look at how I come to this conclusion.
The new head of the CIA was the first appointment of Barak Obama, and within 12 days of his Presidency, his second appointment was Eric Holder as Attorney General of the Department of Justice which many think is the top law enforcement officer of the Nation. Since the FBI is under the DOJ, the two appointments are the two people in charge of Justice in the Federal Government and the only two who can investigate the Federal Government itself.
I am now realizing why these two appointments were the first two things he did in his first 12 days. With the Interstate Commerce Act of 1887, the DOJ took on some law enforcement responsibilities. His authority does not counter the authority of the states, except in interstate commerce laws. However, in practice the DOJ has been considered the top law enforcer of the land.
Within days of the election massive voter fraud was presented to the DOJ but Eric Holder refused to investigate any of them.
When you consider that most likely Hilary Clinton won the primary against BO, and that Al Franken did not win the Senate Seat, and the Black Panthers not being prosecuted, and the Indianapolis/Marion County large numbers of ineligible voters who have died, moved away or are registered more than once in an active ACORN area but DOJ refuses to even investigate, and the Motor Voter fraud case, where ATG Julie Fernandes, said in front of a large group of Voting Section employees,
“We have no interest in enforcing this provision of the law. It has nothing to do with increasing turnout, and we are just not going to do it.”
What would you think?
Consider BO supporters in
Consider the sHare Scan voting machines which produce massive voter fraud and the DOJ refuses to investigate it.
Consider that up to six states already have said they will pass a law that demands that their ELECTORIAL COLLEGE will be required to vote for the candidate that gets the national majority vote, and this violates the constitution but will most likely not be investigated or challenged. This would give four states the power to elect the President.
When you consider what they refuse to investigate and/or refuse to prosecute, do you not see that they are telling those who violate voter laws that they will not prosecute them?
Add to that
that the DOJ has filed a law suit again
This election will be close because there are so many seats that can change but whoever wins the majority it will be by only one or two seats. Fraud in one state can change everything.
Voter Fraud – Al Franken
The group's recently published report found that hundreds of felons voted in the election in which Al Franken, a Democrat, beat then-incumbent Republican Sen. Norm Coleman by just 312 votes out of more than 3 million cast -- a margin that was determined after six months of legal challenges and recounts.
The report, using public election records, state felony conviction documents and hand-sorted searches of voting rosters, found “irrefutable evidence” that hundreds of felons voted illegally in the election, and that the number of felons whose votes were wrongly counted exceeded the margin by which Franken beat Coleman.
“If the feds had done their job and ensured that the voting records were up to date, things would have turned out very differently,” McGrath said.
McGrath charged that efforts to get the federal government involved, even after the election, were met with a wall of silence, despite letters and a meeting with the FBI.
“We sent two letters to the United States Justice Department detailing the problem and met with the FBI, and nothing happened,” he said.
Among the early findings submitted to the
Department of Justice in the first letter, dated Nov. 17, 2008, were that
thousands more votes were cast than voter records supported, and that the
registration rolls contained thousands more voters who had died, moved away,
were registered at vacant lots or were undocumented aliens. Those charges, sent
to the Justice Department in the waning days of the Bush
Two months later, "just as the
A second letter, sent in October 2009 as results of the study began to emerge, also requested a federal investigation, It too was never answered.
E.K. Wilson, spokesman for
the FBI in
Voter Fraud – Dead People Voting
Say Anything notes that Indianapolis/Marion County seems to have more people registered to vote in 2007 then its actual adult citizen population. Even though they only had 644,197 voting age-eligible individuals, there were 677,401 individuals registered to vote, or 105% of the Census population.
It should come as no surprise to anyone that the registration list in Indianapolis/Marion County still has large numbers of ineligible voters – people who have died or moved away, are registered more than once, are not citizens or perhaps don’t even exist given ACORN’s activities there.
After all, when
the U.S. Supreme Court upheld
As the Supreme Court recognized, Motor Voter has provisions “restricting States’ ability to remove names from the lists of registered voters.” In fact, its restrictions and notice provisions are so strict that many states simply stopped doing anything to clean up their voter rolls after Motor Voter became law.
Section 8 of
Motor Voter does contain a provision requiring states to conduct a general program
of “list maintenance” that identifies and removes the names of ineligible
voters. However, the U.S. Department of Justice never filed a single lawsuit
against any state to enforce this provision until 2005, when it finally filed a
Yet the Bush Administration and particularly its Civil Rights Division were subjected to withering criticism by Congress and many traditional civil rights organizations for filing these suits that were unfairly characterized as an attempt to supposedly purge minorities and “suppress voting.”
It seems clear from this report about the voter registration list in Indianapolis/Marion County that they have still not fully complied with the requirement to clean up their voter rolls. All of us should be concerned about this because the larger the pool of invalid names on voter registration rolls, the greater the probabilities that fraudulent votes will be cast in those names by unscrupulous individuals in the upcoming election.
Voter Fraud – Race Preference
I was at the Voting Section of the Justice Department for over five years. This office is responsible for enforcing most federal election laws which do not involve criminal matters. My previous articles at Pajamas Media have spoken of the DOJ’s lawless abandonment of race-neutral enforcement of voting laws, and other outrageous conduct. I will continue to publish here at Pajamas Media more instances of failure to enforce the law equally by the Department.
One such instance relates to the Motor Voter law, and will shock Americans who care about integrity in the electoral process.
Voter” law was passed in 1993 to promote greater voter registration in the
A lesser-known provision also obliged the states to ensure that no ineligible voters were on the rolls — including dead people, felons, and people who had moved. Our current Department of Justice is anxious to encourage the obligations to get everyone registered, but explicitly unwilling to enforce federal law requiring states to remove the dead or ineligible from the rolls.
In November 2009, the entire Voting Section was invited to a meeting with Deputy Assistant Attorney General Julie Fernandes, a political employee serving at the pleasure of the attorney general. The purpose of the meeting was to discuss Motor Voter enforcement decisions.
The room was packed with dozens of Voting Section employees when she made her announcement regarding the provisions related to voter list integrity:
We have no interest in enforcing this provision of the law. It has nothing to do with increasing turnout, and we are just not going to do it.
Jaws dropped around the room.
It is one thing to silently adopt a lawless policy of refusing to enforce a provision of federal law designed to bring integrity to elections. It is quite another to announce the lawlessness to a room full of people who have sworn an oath to fairly enforce the law.
Worse yet, it is a broken campaign promise by Barack Obama, and I’m sure he would not be happy to have heard the announcement. After all, his Assistant Attorney General Tom Perez has been traveling around the country bashing the Bush-era Department of Justice. Perez says as often as he can:
Those who had been entrusted with the keys to the division treated it like a buffet line at the cafeteria, cherry-picking which laws to enforce.
Yet at this meeting, Ms. Fernandes openly relished her time at the buffet line in the Voting Section cafeteria.
The problem with this sort of lawlessness, apart from the fact that it is becoming a trend in this administration, is that it nullifies the important compromise that Congress reached in 1993. Greater access to registration came by turning welfare agencies into voter registration offices, but the law also included provisions to ensure greater integrity. It is a dangerous development for our electoral system when one part of that compromise is tossed overboard by a bureaucrat.
It will be impossible for this purportedly transparent administration to deny this direction was given. There were dozens of good people in the room that I know care more about the truth than about saving Ms. Fernandes’ career.
Plus, the cases the Justice Department has brought — or not brought — corroborate the account: the Department has not filed a single case under the Motor Voter provision where there are problems.
problems with list integrity? Yes, but that’s a story for another article. Even
worse than not bringing cases, the Holder Justice Department has dismissed a
instincts of this administration will no doubt lead to talk about all the cases
the Bush DOJ didn’t bring to open up public welfare agencies to voter
registration. Good luck. I’d suggest citizens go online and see the Section 7
NVRA, or “Motor Voter,” cases that were commenced under the Bush
administration. Bush brought voter registration cases under Motor Voter against
This Justice Department, in contrast, has “cherry picked” which parts of Motor Voter law they will enforce. You wouldn’t think it has anything to do with politics or the upcoming elections, would you?
Christian Adams is an election lawyer who served in the Voting Rights Section
More crimes by
BO supporters in
Voter Fraud – Motor Voter
The enormousness of the problem in
The number of registered voters
threatens to outnumber the voting age population. A total of 247,135
More than 23,000 people on
Though dead for 10 years, St.
Louis Alderman Albert "Red" Villa actually registered to vote this
spring in the city's mayoral primary. Ritzy Mekler, a
mixed breed dog, was also registered to vote in
We saw an Election Day lawsuit
filed to keep the city polls open late because the plaintiff feared he wouldn't
get a chance to vote. Then it turned out the plaintiff was a dead man. When he
was replaced by a live
You may call me cruel and even
discriminatory, but I will persist in trying to limit the voting franchise to
human beings who are not dead yet. Clearly the city of
For example, the motor voter act blocks states from requiring notarization or another form of authentication on mail-in registration cards. Why do we so easily require photo ID to board a plane or to buy beer and cigarettes while leaving the ballot box so undefended?
In addition, once registered, it is almost impossible to get off the lists. Current federal law blocks a person's removal from the voter rolls unless he or she is (1) reported dead, (2) requests removal or (3) the U.S. Postal Service returns certified election board mailings to the person as "undeliverable" and the person fails to vote in two successive federal elections.
Congress passed the motor voter bill with the best intentions. Unfortunately, we now have proof that the very mechanism used to boost voter participation has turned the nation's voter rolls into a tangled mess.
The legacy of the motor voter bill is that it boosted voter participation while reducing the integrity of and confidence in our elections. The best election "reform" Congress can undertake this year is to go back and fix the flaws in the law we passed seven years ago.
Voter Fraud – Intimidation
Crimes by BHO
Voter Fraud – Hart eScan Voting Machines
It was Stalin who said “it’s not the people who vote who decide elections, it’s the people who count the votes!!?”
Hart eScan voting machines, which violate your Constitutional rights by concealing essential counting processes from the public, can easily be manipulated by anyone with inside access to alter election outcomes.
People using the Hart system can alter election results from almost any part of it -- the precinct machines, the Tally software that add up the votes from precincts, the "Rally" software which is designed to communicate with a higher level center, for example, at the state level -- in Ohio this system interfaces with the Secretary of State office.
Tuesday May 18 primary election. These computerized machines use paper ballots, but no electionprocedure compares the real paper ballots with the computerized count.
The state of
See for yourself. Here is a link to the Hart section of the report: www.blackboxvoting.org/hartreport.pdf
These machines, which violate your Constitutional rights by concealing essential counting processes from the public, can easily be manipulated by anyone with inside access to alter election outcomes.
People using the Hart system can alter election results from
almost any part of it -- the precinct machines, the Tally software that add up
the votes from precincts, the "Rally" software which is designed to
communicate with a higher level center, for example, at the state level -- in
Ohio this system interfaces with the Secretary of State office. (Note that in
As a national elections watchdog organization, we find
Recommendations: Please read excerpts from the formal, government-sponsored reports on this system.
If you ask questions about this, you will be told the system is safe. It is NOT!
1. Have someone watching the "TALLY" system. There is a manual entry function which allows an election worker to overwrite election results at the end of the day, while results from different precincts are being aggregated.
Videotape the face of the screen and keyboard and remainattentive if anyone attempts to use the manual entry function.
2. The Hart scanners produce a file which contains photocopies, or
scans, of each ballot. Under
4. Make a list of polling places. Poll workers are required to post the machine tallies at each polling place when the polls close. Get a posse together to visit each polling place and videotape or photograph the tapes. Note that the precinct machines can be made to produce false results, but also the central machine can falsify results. If only the central machine is used for falsification, the posted precinct results won't match the tally.
Mismatched results have been found in
5. Note that almost all elections in
6. If you ask, you will likely find that your county has also
purchased a Hart "BallotNow" machine. This
system can produce an unlimited supply of extra ballots in-house. In recounts, crooked
locations have been caught substituting ballots. (In the state of
Voter Fraud – Don’t Investigate
Voter Fraud – More on DOJ
Poll Watching or Revolution
We all need to start volunteering to check voter registration, check mail-in votes, and poll watch. (I might add, we need to always be ready to record any Bartle Bull-like intimidation as seen in the infamous Philly video). We all need to communicate like we are doing on these pages to share and spread facts, but it’s not enough.
In the immortal words of the 60s, if you’re not part of the solution, you’re part of the problem. The Nov. election will be fraught with fraud if we all assume a fair election. EVERYONE needs to become involved in “ACORN Watch”–no matter what ACORN calls itself now–or the 2nd 2 years of Obamanation will make the 1st 2 look mild.
We need to do
this Saul Alinsky-like “community organizing” right
back at them or the real
When honest citizens are no longer able to rely on the integrity of their government there is only one recourse – full-fledged anarchy. If the problem ain’t fixed soon, unfortunately that will be the only thing left for us to do.
Get involved. Run for office at the local and state levels or work hard for those who do. It’s a very large country. Corruption in large cities and whole regions of the country is hardly new, and yet, governing parties have come and gone many, many times for more than 200 years. I don’t believe, nor should you, that any current party is so well organized that they can hold power in the face of an electorate determined that they should not.
All the tools are there: Local and state parties and offices are more important than they’ve been made out by a celebrity soaked media culture. States’ representatives in DC can not survive without the support of their local electorates. The more that like minded local electorates share and compare notes, the more easily their representative can brought to heel.
The next time you see your local congress critter ask them this: How many of the local electorate serve on their staff in DC? If it’s not a majority, with that majority holding the top positions, why not? If you don’t know the people that actually do the work in your congress critter’s office, do you think they know you? Do you think they care about you or your concerns between elections?
You want change? Put a tight leash on all your representatives. But that will require a lot of effort. If you’re not up to it, then don’t complain.
When more and more injured parties (lost jobs/wages; healthcare rationing; financial institutions) come forth and use the Hawaii elections guy for witness to bring cases re: Obama’s ineligibility to be POTUS, with willing judges like the one who disallowed the moratorium on drilling, then all these illegal orders re: healthcare, finance, homeland security, immigration, etc. will be made null and void. His locked up records will have to be called out in discovery and they will more than likely show a background of all types of falsehoods – perhaps not even a citizen to this day! When it hits where it hurts, more and more just might get more interested in these facts.
This would all
end so quickly if we could get everyone to focus on his ineligibility. We would
have him out of the WH immediately, and all of this could be reversed. Why do
people want to continue doing it the hard way? And in the meantime, he makes
things worse. Why not use the easy and certain way to get rid of him: demand
his removal because his father was not a
It is time (while we still have a conservative majority on SCOTUS) to form Citizen Grand Juries in our local counties and indict BO & his co-conspirators in our State Courts for crimes committed by his campaign in 2007 & 2008.
Supreme Court – Has Power
Newsmax.com recently reported:
“One thing appears certain: Supreme Court Justice John Roberts isn’t likely to back down to Obama. Roberts reportedly still is angry over President Obama’s decision to use the State of the Union address to scold the justices for their Citizens United v. FEC ruling, which rejected limitations on corporate and nonprofit electioneering.
Obama said during the State of the Union address that the ruling would “open
the floodgates” to donations by foreign companies and other special interests
The president’s decision to use his bully pulpit to frame the ruling’s political impact incorrectly may have caused lasting damage to his relationship with the judiciary. The Los Angeles Times reported on Tuesday that “Chief Justice John Roberts Jr. is still angered by what he saw as a highly partisan insult to the independent judiciary.”
The Los Angeles Times reported Monday that a number of legal scholars now consider a clash between the expansive pro-government plans of the Obama administration and the Roberts court to be inevitable.”
For information on forming a Secret Grand Jury to investigate crimes go here:
For information on Crimes committed by the BO campaign:
As in Marbury, We the People shall prosecute our cases against Barrack Hussein Obama petitioning the United States Supreme Court for a Writ of Mandamus compelling Barrack Hussein Obama to abide by the Constitutional Contract that he entered into with We the People on January 20, 2009 and uphold his Oath to abide by the Supreme Law of the Land, the Constitution of the United States of America.
It is stated in
“The office of a writ of mandamus is to compel the performance of a duty resting upon the person to whom the writ is sent. That duty may have originated in one way or in another. It may, as alleged in the present case, have arisen from the acceptance of an office which has imposed the duty upon its incumbent. But no matter out of what fact or relations the duty has grown, what the law requires, and what it seeks to enforce by a writ of mandamus, is the personal obligation of the individual to whom it addresses the writ.”
Following much good faith research regarding the issue of original jurisdiction in the Supreme Court of the United States, We the People have found no cases in the history of jurisprudence of the United States of America wherein a Defendant disputed the Constitutional fact that the Supreme Court of the United States has original jurisdiction over “all Cases affecting Ambassadors, other public Ministers and Consuls” as plainly stated in the Constitution of the United States, Article III, Section 2.
That being the case, “We the People” respectfully request that the Barack Hussein Obama stipulate to the fact that the Supreme Court of the United States has original jurisdiction over all Cases affecting Ambassadors, other public Ministers and Consuls; or, in the alternative, that Barack Hussein Obama show good cause why the Supreme Court of the United States shall not have original jurisdiction
LONG TERM SOLUTIONS
By Bev Harris
This was done in 2010 by the town of
There is no reason to conceal vote-counting from the public. It is a human rights violation, because freedom is a human right. If you cannot select your own governors through public elections, you are not free. If essential election processes are concealed from you, the elections are NOT public, but are controlled by insiders, which is actually a transfer of power.
These are simple concepts, but implementing them can feel
overwhelming. Nevertheless, people are succeeding, overseas and also here in
We wish you the best in the upcoming election. I will be here in
Bev Harris - Founder and Director - Black Box Voting, Inc. - 206-335-7747
See Black Box Voting and Bev Harris in action: HBO Emmy-nominated documentary, Hacking Democracy, is viewable
for free on YouTube and we will send you an official HBO DVD of the film with donations
of $100 or more. Our monthly expenses run about $11,000, which includes
salaries, communications, Web site, and travel. Our total nest egg is currently
about $36,000. We would like to be here for the critically important elections
in November. One substantial donation from you makes a real impact on